Of CoolerMaster V850, barely @120V by virtue of higher efficiency than the corsairs (but still only rated to 840W on +12V). But the Jupiter's were pulling 950-ish at the wall at release up through .95 firmware being released. The Corsair HX850's that some people were buying were definitely out-of-spec at that wattage due to a smaller actual +12V rail wattage than the overall PSU (again 840W) and slightly lower efficiency.
EFFICIENCY DOESN'T CHANGE THE DC LOAD. IT ONLY CHANGES HOW MUCH MORE POWER IS USED ON AC SIDE.
SO AN 800W DC is ALWAYS GOING TO BE 800W DC. POWER SUPPLIES ARE RATED BASED ON THE DC LOAD. THE AC LOAD WILL BE HIGHER, THE LOWER THE EFFICIENCY THE HIGHER IT WILL BE BUT THAT DOESN'T CHANGE WHAT THE DC LOAD WAS.
BUT WHEN YOU CALCULATE BACKWARDS FROM A WALL WATTAGE TO A DC WATTAGE, YOU USE THE EFFICIENCY RATING TO DO SO AND SINCE CYPER QUOTED A WALL WATTAGE IN HIS STATEMENT OF BEING IN SPEC, IT IS APROPOS TO USE THE EFFICIENCY AS PART OF THE SUPPORTING DATA. IN ADDITION, IT IS PROBABLE THAT THE COOLERMASTER UNITS HAVE A MARGIN BUILT INTO THEIR 840 RATING WHEREAS THE CORSAIR UNITS OBVIOUSLY DID NOT.
All caps is fun, does that make me as cool as you think you are?