People insinuating against a particular feline entity that took it upon itself to be the sword of vengeance against spammers is nothing new. The same pattern repeats in this thread. "concern trolling for vengeance," is exactly what they do. Its pathetic seeing everyone trying to take a bite whenever the opportunity presents itself. People suddenly change their "Joined Twitter" "Great Project" ways to become some sort of forum vigilantes. Like endlasuresh as an example.

aTriz deciding to ignore the "1 BTC raised" issue with bitblisscoin represents his own dishonesty. Infact, he is the one who implicated himself by accepting this in the first place. OgNasty and QS then jumped in as they couldn't let go this juicy opportunity to make Lauda and ALU look bad. They started their usual to-and-fro arguments with one insinuating and the other confirming. The pattern just can't be missed..
There is some hard to follow, old feud between them with Lauda being part of some "extortion scam"; OgNasty being called out for his mismanagement of Nasty Fans; being told that he lives in a shack; QS as usual the hard to understand shadowy figure negged to max for alt-peddling and self-escrows and then OgNasty deciding to support him. It is so confusing and convoluted that you will find it hard to follow the past. Most of the level headed members side with Lauda on this and their past actions for moderating the forum too justify this choice.

---

Why do all the idiots and trolls who invest in ICO's in hope of flipping for gains think they can hold managers responsible for their funds?? In the screenshot of snakey's post above, He says "I invested 7000$ after seeing it endorsed by ALU". What kind of stupidity is this? When has ALU claimed to check the credentials of the ICO devs?? All they can lay claim to is that the manager won't run away with your "stakes" or "escrowed BTC" meant for bounty distributions. (Like a lot of scammy managers were doing at one time).

If some idiot decides to invest 7k USD because ALU purportedly supported / endorsed the ICO, then they would have invested a lot more in their earlier ICOs too. And flipped them for gains. ICO investing is a perilous thing. You gain some, you lose some. He invested because he wanted to see his money get doubled. Little else.

The other purpose of this thread to get aTriz negged is fulfilled. Why else is this still going on?? Lock it already.
But wait, Looks like there are more vultures joining in. Pathetic!