I actually do think that these ratings are unwarranted unless there's a suitable reference attached.
When I discovered an alt ring of users that have the prefix 'cripto' I was careful not to tag people who are innocent. There's always the chance of collision with identification via username thus I believe we should give the benefit of the doubt to anyone if there is no sufficient evidence.
I looked for hours at the posting clusters on the altcoin discussion section and the dates of registration for these accounts--and I have no doubt they're alts.
Funny how crypto[pussy/heroin/morphines/marijuana/atomic/devs/titan/crocs/mngr/spear/bobo/nero/prophecy/ux/tsunami/
and others piped up within about 4 hours of me leaving the new feedbacks.
These accounts all have suspiciously similar posting styles as well, and their output is all shitposting. This guy is a huge spammer and the feedback is well deserved.
Edit: And interestingly, all of the accounts I tagged are in different bounties. There's no overlap whatsoever, as if the owner of the alts was deliberately trying not to register two accounts in the same bounty. I'd also like this guy to list which accounts are his and which are not.