Yes, and no:
1) Yes, because it is not possible to provide objective proof of unawareness.
2) No, because the wording 'entire ALU' is flawed and none of those projects were aTriz's (as far as I know; bounty managers usually have nothing to do with the project in the sense that the team behind the project is not related/the same as the individual/team managing the bounty). Some people were not part of it at the time (IIRC), and community management has nothing to do with bounty management unless they directly knew about that fraudulent statement (which goes back to point 1).

---

It's the classic smear tactic[1], similar to the pedophile/pill addict/racist/whatever accusations. You can deny everything, but you can't prove your denial which is why usually the accuser needs to provide proof for the allegation - legally, plaintiff (which doesn't seem to be the norm when going after me).

---

[1] To clarify, I'm not saying you are trying to smear my name (with this post). This is a general observation/statement regarding prior (obviously lies) accusations and the way of conduct when going after me.