-snip-
It does not. However, bounty managers are not responsible for validity of information provided by others nor are they obligated to check any of that later on (e.g. whitepaper validity, road-map, statements in general). However, when they are made aware of a clear lie the obvious course of action would be to pull the plug (at least make them instantly retract and apologize; which wouldn't be adequate given the scale of the lie here).
I totally agree.
I'm actually liking the way this Israel styled plausible deniability debate is ON.

I can't cryptographically prove that I didn't know, and you can't cryptographically prove that I knew (which is what was meant with '
objective proof'). The Quickscammer style '
friend of a friend unidentified reliable source' bullshit doesn't do it for anyone with a brain bigger than 2 peanuts.
I wonder why a "pathological liar" (according to certain baboons) would make reasonable statements regarding validity of proof. 
Whoever said that pathological liars aren't aware of validity of proof.
A thief knows more about locks than the lockowner or perhaps even lockmakers.