Again with this shit? You and the guy who wrote the article are using the incompleteness theorem wrong. I already discussed this with you...
We indeed did debate this topic. We reduced the argument down to its very basic assumptions which you were unable to refute. You lost that debate though your ideology will likely never allow you to see that.
If you need to review here is a good place to look. My own argument is less ambitious then that of Perry Marshall and depends only on the first two assumptions.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1373864.msg24814610#msg24814610
Science works, your metaphysical bullshit pseudo science doesn't. Science keeps bringing results meanwhile religion does nothing. Ok, sometimes they try to disrupt science like with stem cells.
I replied to this here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1373864.msg35917300#msg35917300