That being said, when I look at Lich's explorer, a reindex may or may not be the explanation. I agree that the lower block number displayed indicates a partial index, but with a total supply of 0 and a price of 0, it could be something else is down. The hash rate is there, so the wallet is probably running, but depending on how he configured the total supply column, a reindex MIGHT be the explanation for the 0 there. As for the price of 0, I don't know if he ever had the C-CEX API configured to return a price...
It's reindexing, but it shows partial data because Iquidus proactively adds unknown TXs when a block number or hash is queried.
75% is ok because if somebody has 1.5m for masternode, then he will build it. does not make sense to keep 1.5m in wallet
It still makes sense, because 1,5M BBP is enought to stake for 70K RAC, and that's about 11K BBP a day as of today, which is more than what a Sanc is giving now (unless mining costs "eats" the difference, of course)
This stalking debate is going to be always the same: if 3 guys have let's say, 50% of power, they are going to get 50% of rewards whatever system we employ. And I think that having millions of BBP "locked" down is economically harmful for them, but only if they have to pay their bills. Of course if we are talking about rogues and botnets, this stalking parameter is not going to stop them, because they have no penalty for having all that dough locked down.