It is very strange to see people rewarded with merits to "sell" things.
They're giving a service to the community, but they're working and they're paid for doing it.
That is very far from receiveng deserved merit points in my opinion.
So here's next dimension Merit discussion thread 2.0 in which we are going to discuss if someone has deserved his Merit.
I am wondering: is it the fault of the one who has given sMerit, or is the one who has received it to blame?
Neither one of them. But the fact is, merit should be given to any member with quality post. Where is the credibilty of the Merit Sytem if only wasted on ANN
I think that the merit should be given to people who have done a solid job in the bounty program, but for various reasons have not been rewarded - most often the failure of the project.
Ow really? This furom made for learning bitcoin thru conversation and merit has implemented to give it to the deserving members, is the successful campaign deserve it?