That's very good news for Guncoin indeed. I agree with every point in that article, but it's rife with grammatical errors. I don't want to nitpick, but this is pretty important to make a good first impression. I could fix them, but who do I send a revised copy to if I did that?
Well, we did not write the article, nor review it and it is published by someone outside of the immediate Guncoin team. For now, we are pleased to have the publicity and think it is a good article.
I was pretty sure that it wasn't written by the Guncoin team. I'm very happy for the publicity of course. I just get annoyed when I read an article that appears to have been posted without any proof reading first. It's probably just my old school upbringing and perfectionist nature over reacting.