Everything you've said here is 100% accurate and we believe the crap that's being pulled by "experts" on sites like ICObench is far worse than this example suggests.
And since we
don't mind being a wall of shame we have posted all the deets here:
http://www.tokenicide.com/review/einc/and here:
http://www.tokenicide.com/opinion/icobench-warmer/At this point we would call into question the quality of
any ICO that has its advisory board packed with more than just one or two top-rated "experts" from ICObench.
And ICObench is only one of many sites playing this game. The only reason we've focused on them is because (1) they happen to be the most heavily trafficked ICO rating site; (2) what they're doing is so blatantly obvious that it was easy to spot; and (3) we just started working on this project about a week ago so we haven't had time to call out any of the other bad actors. But we're working on it. And we welcome any suggestions as to other sites/advisors/ICOs that need public shaming.
