Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Negative Feedback.
by
BTCforJoe
on 05/05/2018, 12:44:52 UTC
⭐ Merited by Vod (1)

1) None of the profiles applied to any campaigns or bounties with the same addresses.


That's not why you were tagged, though. You were tagged for having multiple accounts participate in the same bounty campaign, and then having funds transferred from ETH accounts related to the multis to the ETH address that was previously associated with your current account.

There is an outbound transaction from @Adioliver's recorded ETH address (0x2425736D0764A630bc011C6118d3d01DdbF79470) to a recorded ETH address (0x9bB968440878783811eCf303523C35B7643a9c73) that you've used in the past, as can be seen here:

1. BTT Username: Sasuke102001
2. ETH Address:0x9bb968440878783811ecf303523c35b7643a9c73
3. Telegram username: @UchihASasukee
4. Date Joined the Telegram: 4th February 2018

The same is also evident with @Fazlurkhan.kz's recorded ETH address (0x856FaB3402D730045Ea0446CAD094c4A62dce37e) having an outbound transaction to your recorded ETH address.

Stating "Just one transaction with each address, no frequent transactions that can raise suspicion." is not enough to reduce suspicion. All it takes is one transaction to take place in order for suspicion to be aroused. There were TWO transactions (one each from two separate accounts) that took place from those individual accounts to yours.

You got caught. Deal with it.