Today I was on a conference in Vilnius and went on a lecture about cryptocurrencies. I would like to share some aspects which I did't see so clear before. As we know, among those states which want to regulate cryptos, there are those which consider them as property and others as means of payment. The first approach is usually seen when there are tax companies around, because money is not taxed, but possession is. So when a state days they consider cryptos as property, it means they are getting taxed, while this is not the case with means of payment.
What do you think of this?
'Though money is not a property, it can is earn through our personal effort and every earning we make is subjected to pay on the government if it is under the authority of government, but since btc is decentralized, taxes is not applicable so whether it is called a property or money that doesn't matter.