Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUE: Super-lightweight HW wallets and offline data
by
RagnarDanneskjold
on 21/11/2013, 10:29:45 UTC
The sweet spot is probably 16 and 32-bit microprocessors: fast enough to handle crypto without pain, small enough that hiding malicious features is very tough for the manufacturer, and cheap enough that the community has a chance of auditing the actual shipped hardware and firmware against the claimed design.
It shouldn't be a microprocessor at all.

Think something like this, but to perform ECDSA instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/555_timer_IC

Truly secure hardware wallets will need to be built at the level of electrical engineering, not software engineering.

I am an electrical engineer, and frankly what you're saying is crazy.

Just curious - why so crazy?

AND... EVEN MORE CURIOUS - do you mean you are an ELECTRONIC engineer??  

ELECTRICAL engineering has NOTHING to do with electronics, hardware, or anything else discussed on this thread? Just sayin.

Mind you, the original commenter also misspoke in describing this as "electrical engineering" work