So you will allow female genital mutilation. I assume the same logic applies to honour killings, bride burning and the like.
If that is what anarchy requires, then I don't see it ever "working."
False. I will not allow my child to have her genitals mutilated. That's the point; it requires a rational society, of which you'd find no place if you will not even acknowledge when you're wrong.
As I said, you have no morality. You don't want your child hurt but you turn a blind eye to a neighbour's child having her clitoris cut off without anaesthetic. Disgusting.
False. You have no idea what morality is, either, if you believe people can be with or without them. Hawker, take my advice: take a class on philosophy, specifically on ethics. It'll help.
Take care

Wait - you are happy to allow female genital mutilation, provided its not done to your daughter, and now you want to go all happy-clappy about believing in people?
If this is how your vision of anarchy "works" you'll find that people won't allow it. As I say, disgusting.
Wait, wait... one of your disagreements with anarchy is because under it, some people somewhere might be circumcising their daughters?
We already live in a world with practically everyone under the thumb of some government, and this already happens. I wouldn't be surprised if there was a government or two that mandated it.
How is anarchy worse in that regard?