Either gold and Bitcoin both have intrinsic value, or neither has it. The intrinsic value lies in the attributes. The fact that gold's a nice shiny rock was only useful for bootstrapping gold as a currency.
Can you make a necklace, ring, toilet or any other tangible item from Bitcoin? Is Bitcoin conductive? Trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, is never going to work, no matter how bad you want to. Gold has been useful for MANY things beyond currency. It might behove you to actually research gold throughout history. Your statement smells a lot like ignorance.
That's not intrinsic value. It's just, not. It's alternative uses which in the past have caused Gold to be bootstrapped as store of value. Take the store of value away and gold will drop to <5% of its market cap. Bitcoin will retain some of its value too in that case as its a secure distributed ledger, but it will be <1%.
Either gold and Bitcoin both have counter party risk, or neither has it. Bitcoin functions fine without electricity, it's just the transfers which must occur off-blockchain then. But remember: gold transactions are ALWAYS off blockchain, Bitcoin's only in a weird and unlikely edge case.
Really? More square peg, round hole syndrome. How does Bitcoin function without computers? How would transactions get processes without miners? Thus, I don't think Bitcoin is going to work "fine" at all without electricity. Gold requires nothing to exist. Not sure how to make that any clearer.
How do transactions get progressed for gold without electricity? Bitcoin can function in the same way (but it loses a lot of it edge, albeit temporarily until power is restored).