...snip...
To be honest I don't come at this from a moral "what is right" perspective at all. Instead I tend to look at it from a pragmatic, process-oriented perspective. What is most likely to yield positive results? (yes, positive results is a moral value-judgement as well)
Surely that is the problem with the whole concept of anarcky "working?" It forces your lack of morality on people who disagree with you. And you have no right to do that do you? Mike Christ's position on female genital mutilation is that its fine provided its not done to his daughter. My position is that its an abomination. I see no reason to allow Mike's or anyone else's sunny indifference to human suffering to be the limit of what laws we make and enforce.