Your fundamental premise is flawed.
a) You're equating coin distribution with wealth distribution, and not even bothering to define wealth in real terms.
No I am equating it with transaction distribution (velocity), which is wealth generation (proportional to ~GDP) in the QTM.
b) You're looking at the numbers as a static system, not one with flows and velocities.
How so? I think you are the one is not looking at that.
First prove that large stakeholders who control, say, 5% of the money base, do indeed have 1000 times more usable 'mojo' compared to stakeholders with only 0.005%, and then we can talk.
I don't understand. Appears you are inferring a premise on me that I have not made. Perhaps I think the opposite of what you wrote, if I understand what you might be trying to say. Seems to me the 0.005% have 1000 times more usable 'mojo' than the 5%, because they comprise 1000 times more unique brains.
Read this to understand why I think plethora of unique brains are more valuable than a few very smart brains (when we are outside the 3% in the power-law):
http://unheresy.com/Information%20Is%20Alive.html