How about instead of these rackets you have several companies that offer security and you can choose which to go with? One of these stipulations of these companies will be, for example, we will provide you protection from being murdered but if you murder someone then by the terms of the contract you must go to arbitration and accept the judgement. It's through this process that the laws that you live under are formed. The company has incentive overall to provide laws that are to the best benefit of the majority of their customers.
You ignored my question about those poor ones who either refused to choose your "law provider" or chose the wrong "benefactor". Should they give in to the majority or what? Should your "laws" then be applicable to them or they shoud be in reservations and concentration camps as soon as possible?
