Thanks, very interesting to read. Although it tends to support "Bitcoin isn't real money" overall.
Yes, of course, If I remember it correctly, what they say is that bitcoin can't be considered as money (yet) due to its volatility in the market. To me, it makes sense, for the money should be used as a mechanism of change between products or as a way of getting commodities. If you can't determinate at what price are you going to sell any commodity (due to the volatility of the coin you want to use), it is normal for Bitcoin to can't be considered as money (yet). Nevertheless, in the article, there are many terms of discussion, as I understand, the whole text it seems to be looking for a way of introducing btc into the economy, which means good news.
Just as expected for those words to come out which is really indeed the fact about bitcoin which it isnt considered as money.There are lots of things which would really not collaborate on bitcoins feature or price behavior thats why its normal for them to see or discussed the negative part but on the latter part they do already giving or putting attention into its existence.