....but did his negative trust or his merit resignation come first? I wasn't around for that day, or those couple of days, it's been a busy past month. I've missed a lot of the nuance and inner-workings of these issues.
The resignation came 4 days before the red paint was splattered.
Is that a fair assumption to make? Would the evidence or the announcements support the idea that they are all merit sources? Also, outside of Global moderators or other DT members, are there any examples of those with a negative DT trust rating that are sources?
Reasonably fair looking at the
Most generous merit senders, all time page. The said Global Moderator is 14th with 445 Merit sent.
As for other sources with red paint, I don't know but I'd guess it would depend on the circumstances rather than be a set rule.