Also Gödel's incompleteness theorems which state that no theory of computation can be both complete and consistent, as there will always exist another truth which can't be proven by the existing theory.
Yes, and I'm trying to explain that this applies to
your theory as well. Yet you seem to think that your particular theory is all encompassing -- internally consistent and complete.
I can tell you off-hand that a theory that basically says the universe
is "a multi-dimensional holographic 'doughnut' made of vibrating tines and lots of standing waves", still doesn't explain any of these things:
illusions
consciousness/ego/self
qualia
and of course creativity. Oh wait, those last 3 are all just illusions. Explain illusions then.
I have already alluded to the explanation of all those phenomena. I guess I will need to write a treatise to expound for those who can't/won't extrapolate from the generative essence I have presented.
You'll burn yourself out. Why not do something useful?