In the ICO review websites you have posted on this topic, I usually use ICObench to evaluate the ICO project because this site gives very accurate results. ICObench was created and established to evaluate potential ICOs based on expert opinion. So if an ICO project is rated> 4.5 on this website then surely that project will have potential if it invests or joins the bounty.
I disagree with the usefulness of icobench. I agree that it might be worth to read through such marketing platforms as the ones mentioned above, but I would like to highlight that these ICObench experts are often charging incredible amounts and are not necessarily properly reflecting the technical, business, governance and legal setup of the project. Furthermore, if the team is involved into multiple projects, there can be a significant lack of commitment. E.g. how can an advisor like Vladimir Nikitin (icobench #3) provide serious advice to more than 40 projects?
With Alethena we are about to provide a sustainable and transparent solution and we are gonna release our demo version shortly. Please check out our website
https://www.alethena.com