If all managers do this, then things would be fine, without needing to heavily change up how campaigns work, and open up new avenues of abuse.
Only thing :
Bounty managers don't give a rat's ass about it. And half or probably even more of the bounty managers are new to the forum and don't even care to check out the post quality.
More reason to hold them accountable for their campaign participant's actions, or kick them the fuck out! Those bounties are shit opportunities for people anyway, literally peddling rubbish.
But going as extreme as getting per merit doesn't help the companies trying to do the advertising and will lead to other cheating activities. Let's not try to complicate the system, let's just do a better job calling out and eliminating those that abuse it.
I like what Yahoo62278 is doing better, which is to require a minimum amount of merits before even being accepted. That weeds out a lot of shitposters.
Not necessarily.
Yahoo's campaign participants [/url]were caught sending merits to one another just so that they could enter the campaign. Hilariousandco found a few of them but that's not the end.
As long as Yahoo and others are policing their campaign's people. Yahoo's been around a long time, I don't expect anything less from him.