It's also nothing more than a CAD drawing. The real, physical objects in the photo were 3D printed mockups of an assembled board and off-the-shelf hardware that anyone in this thread could go out and buy right now.
As in, their "proof" that their product actually physically exists and is coming along amounts to a CAD drawing (which proves nothing of the sort), a 3D printed dummy version of their board, and an assortment of readily available consumer hardware.
It seems like you're the one being "intentionally dishonest or honestly obtuse" here.
As in, their "proof" that their product actually physically exists and is coming along amounts to a CAD drawing (which proves nothing of the sort), a 3D printed dummy version of their board, and an assortment of readily available consumer hardware.
It seems like you're the one being "intentionally dishonest or honestly obtuse" here.
Please quote where I said it was wasn't a CAD drawing.
Oh wait; you can't. Because I never said it wasn't CAD drawing.
This PCB design is not trivial, despite your snotty dismissal of its significance and pedantic ELIF of the mock-up.
Would you rather the PCB design not be complete?
The short turn-around time for PCB manufacturing has already been covered at length, on this thread as well as every other fucking ASIC thread. And yet here you are, still unable to grasp the simple fact that PCBs are trivial to quickly assemble once the difficult design phase is complete.
Grow up and stop drinking cevidad's Haterade.
You've included an impressive number of logical fallacies in your response.
Arguing a point that was never in contention ("Please quote where I said it was wasn't [sic] a CAD drawing")? Check. Making unrelated points ("PCB design is not trivial") as a rebuttal (to the only real point "they demonstrated no physical thing that's not off-the-shelf or a dummy mockup")? Check. Ad-hominems scattered throughout? Check.
If anyone around here actually listens to a word you say this post alone ought to convince them to stop.