Exactly, all I can do is spending my time if a client is willing to pay me for my time, if the tag is illegit, I can spend my time to point that out for DT1 members to see and reconsider on including or excluding people from their trust list= having a fair system at the end.
So what you are saying is, "Instead of discussing why your tag is illegit directly with the person who tagged you , let's add in an unnecessary middle-man - discuss it with me, and then I'll discuss it with them on your behalf. Also, pay me for this nonsense".
Got ya.
Why should I discuss the tag with abusers? they are the ones abusing, they are the ones who should be judged, they are judging people wrongfully and nobody is judging their actions, if I have to resolve the issue only with you after you have tagged me, you could dictate whatever terms you wish, that is wrong and that is abuse of power.