BS here as well. I can write whatever I like in my TOS. But when it comes to the courts the TOS is as good as shit. You need to make sure your TOS doesn't violate the law first.
How does/did the TOS violate the law? Which law does it violate?
You had to beg Kris to realise there was a bug. And, knowing there was a bug, you left your funds there. OK.... I wish I was as smart as you...
This kind of shit brings in all the security loop-holes.
This kind of statement makes you appear smart, but it is actually without any foundation.
As for your assertion I am Kris, or Kris's shill or any derivation of that - I am not. I lost btc in this hack. Unlike you however, I am not looking for a scapegoat.
It's called being an adult and taking responsibility for one's own actions. If you argue that Kris has to take responsibility for the hack, then you are, by implication, saying he did it.
You yourself allegedly knew the code was not sound. Yet you didn't tell anyone else, and in fact kept your btc stored in Bips. If you are so good at finding bugs, why did you not start your own service instead of using what you saw as an inferior product.. However, such questions divert from the topic, which is the breach.
It happened. We lost our btc. The lesson seems to be to not use hot wallets.