So, we have delays on the eAsic chips, but we already shipped ? How is that possible?
We've shipped some units using the original chips, and we're developing new chips which will be slightly delayed but more useful in the long term.
Indeed. There are some here that would argue that it would have been in our best interests to go with the original chips in order to get them hashing sooner. But the thing is it's Ken, and not opinionated shareholders who has the data and he obviously thinks that going with eAsic chip 2.0 is the way forward, albeit delayed.