This kind of shit brings in all the security loop-holes.
This kind of statement makes you appear smart, but it is actually without any foundation.
Oh yeah? I bet you haven't written a single line of code in your life.
As for your assertion I am Kris, or Kris's shill or any derivation of that - I am not. I lost btc in this hack. Unlike you however, I am not looking for a scapegoat.
Obviously you aren't looking for a scapegoat. You stole our funds, why would you feel anything at all?
It's called being an adult and taking responsibility for one's own actions.
Nice try Kris. The first thing about being an adult is to man up and become transparent about the so called "hack". The very fact that there is absolutely zero information on the hack shows you are the thief. Period.
If you argue that Kris has to take responsibility for the hack, then you are, by implication, saying he did it.
Kris (or you) did not do the hack. The hack never happend. He (or you) just moved all the funds to a new address... in plain simple words Kris (or you) just stole our funds. If it was a hack I want all the technical details laid out in public domain. The onus is one you (Kris) to prove he (you) is innocent.
You yourself allegedly knew the code was not sound. Yet you didn't tell anyone else, and in fact kept your btc stored in Bips. If you are so good at finding bugs, why did you not start your own service instead of using what you saw as an inferior product.. However, such questions divert from the topic, which is the breach.
It happened. We lost our btc. The lesson seems to be to not use hot wallets.
Okay Kris I'll answer your questions (wish you used your real name here instead). Firstly when I asked you to fix the bug you told me clearly that you will fix it asap (and that you were upgrading your systems and needed some time). Now I gave you that benefit of doubt. Now I never in my wildest dreams thought that upgrading your systems meant steal your customers funds.
Secondly, when I say violate law I did not mean the TOS violates law. I shouldn't have mixed two different things in the same sentence (was clearly pissed). What I'm trying to say is you can write whatever you want in your TOS. When it comes to legalities the TOS is used only by customers to demand their rights to a defaulting service. If you are the owner, you don't have any say as you can change the TOS at any time. Its like a rental agreement. The tenant has more legal rights compared to the owner. TOS gives the customers more legal ammunition to go after the owner of the defaulting service... not the other way round. So either you (Kris) have a really bad lawyer or are just talking shit to divert attention from the main issue: theft of our funds. By the way I have already consulted my lawyer and I'll be going ahead with legal proceedings.