Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][LBTC]Lightning Bitcoin | First DPoS fork of BTC | Claim FREE coin now
by
ScamResolver2
on 21/05/2018, 08:12:29 UTC
Why LBTC it's a bad choice?

2.7kk for founder 4th February.


Decentralization? What's this?

  • 51 nodes taken by cobo pool. People dont care about ecology, vote only for rewards, for pool.
  • Other 48 nodes – its investors or founder nodes. Proof: take any node from 101, not pool. For example “ghostfaceuk”. Check voters, check few addresses and look how this addresses got coins. For example: 1BQGEE1SVdWrozWSU1duDgDZqdpzYdMCzQ 25th February from 1ZiqgsBUGurqHtEL3zrebR5GHsRKSgHzr and this address take 50 000 coins from fork 19XAxUp72VuwxYvrKE5DJWY1SGTCxDLbeH address. Also you can just look 1ZiqgsBUGurqHtEL3zrebR5GHsRKSgHzr transactions and check their votes. https://explorer.lbtcscan.io/address/1ZiqgsBUGurqHtEL3zrebR5GHsRKSgHzr it's easier.
  • Some votes from this address (1ZiqgsBUGurqHtEL3zrebR5GHsRKSgHzr) voted for cobo pool, so he take part of little investors rewards.

Segwit

  • LBTC cuted segwit support. I thought why the Segwit support was not included. And I came to a conclusion - to avoid competition. You can independently count how many coins were on Segwit addresses and cut them from the circulating supply.

Conclusion: founder trying hide his selling “community coins”, coin controlled by one man.

P.S. The article is written in a hurry, this is my personal opinion and I will be glad to hear the opinion of the community.

Update: Funny official answer from founder:

https://imgur.com/fA8ErWO

  • no any proof
  • no answers about votes for himself nodes and cobo pool