Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Serial feedback blackmailer - mdayonliner
by
mdayonliner
on 21/05/2018, 11:59:06 UTC

I never said that I published them on here. To track scammers can take months of patience and work.  Grin
A lot of it goes straight to the relevant authorities - with solid admissable evidence (not just accusations) and to others with far more flair for publishing.
Like this one: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2198496.msg22099683#msg22099683
I prefer to quietly work in the background and provide the info to the right people.  Grin

https://i.imgur.com/d1ZWQLj.png




I can't believe how many threads mdayonliner has opened about fairly much the same thing. I've made 3 topics in my entire time on bitcointalk. The guy is not a DT so many people just laugh it off because his feedback is harmless. It doesn't mean that the conduct is acceptable. It just means that it is of little consequence.

Anyway, it's untrusted feedback and I know you're not worried about it.  If this was a DT member, all hell would've broken loose already I'm sure. This isn't going to affect the other members involved much either, unless they have very thin skin.  

I think mdayonliner's conclusions are wrong and I stated as much in the other thread. I think the "terms" of feedback removal are too convoluted and sometimes mdayonliner can seem like a bit of a drama queen but I don't see malicious intent here.

I doubt that the users on the pages and pages of untrusted feedback are even aware of the public accusations made against them since he hasn’t even bothered to contact them. I personally wouldn’t have known if someone hadn’t pointed it out to me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1432468

1 Lucky you. If I were a DT or staff or even high ranked member then I would never give you this second chance. I need to save my own ass.

It is quite clear from his attitude towards me and others that he thinks he has done nothing wrong and the statement above indicates that he would act even more vindictive if he had more power.


It would have been nice to know when someone tries to dob me in - for something that has a simple explaination. A message would have been a minimum courtesy.

I wish I could but there are so many cases I am investigating that I have actually no time to PM individuals asking for explanations. That's why I always leave the RedTrust removal link on the tag I give.
 

If you are going to accuse someone of something in public then there is a duty to make them aware of it. If you are going to second guess their motives then they should have the opportunity to state their case.

I don't accept his "I wish I could but there are so many cases I am investigating that I have actually no time to PM individuals asking for explanations.". For someone who boasts about making 50+ posts a week in his signature. It would take less time to send a simple format template message than to leave feedback.

If it was about "educating" others then he would have contacted them. I see the tagging quietly as vindictive and self preservation - because if nobody gets the opportunity defend themselves (because they are unaware) he can "conclude" all his "cases" without any of their input - nor get feedback.

I rarely look at untrusted feedback and many users would be quietly unaware that it even exists.

I see something seriously wrong and warped with his conduct.

The answer for all your shits are here: Stop being a schoolboy type @xtraelv.

PS: Read carefully before you reply. It makes your claims non-sense.