a very good rating, ICOBench is for me the only review site that I reasonably believe
But for the first time, I see that they have a bot for the ratings and this is even rated higher than the rating from humans.
James Sowers but generally seems to give good reviews, I see many 5/5
Icobench.com ratings Change over time, you may check it some other time and get more reviews, they keep monitoring the progress of the ICO and when they see any fault they get it change, I have observed that about them {Icobench.com) which is why a lot of people have faith in them to an extent
yes, I already noticed that more and more reviews are added to the projects. Let's see how the new ratings for Superbloom will be. I would give them a 4.5 :-)
What do they lose points on in your opinion? IE would could they improve on if your only scoring them 4.5/5
I dunno if I would give any ico a 5/5 lol just because no project is perfect XD but thats my stingy internal voting lol though from what Ive seen from superbloom their damn near a 5 especially if I weight it towards how well they have handled their marketing
This is very true Superbloom's marketing of their ICO has been very good and I would definitely give them a 5/5 for this aspect of the project.
I also think their idea is a 5/5 too, they promote vetting pre-ICO tokens which can only be a good thing for members and they handpick the very best projects that their expert analysts have found, ensuring that Superbloom members do not fall short to scam ICO's or teams with questionable motives, which unfortunately is all too common in crypto.
The fact they are offering no-fee investing (minus the membership fee) and airdrops for their listed tokens is another massive advantage. I think this type of service is very much needed in the crypto space.