a very good rating, ICOBench is for me the only review site that I reasonably believe
But for the first time, I see that they have a bot for the ratings and this is even rated higher than the rating from humans.
James Sowers but generally seems to give good reviews, I see many 5/5
Icobench.com ratings Change over time, you may check it some other time and get more reviews, they keep monitoring the progress of the ICO and when they see any fault they get it change, I have observed that about them {Icobench.com) which is why a lot of people have faith in them to an extent
yes, I already noticed that more and more reviews are added to the projects. Let's see how the new ratings for Superbloom will be. I would give them a 4.5 :-)
What do they lose points on in your opinion? IE would could they improve on if your only scoring them 4.5/5
The most important reason for the point deduction is the difficult accessibility to the white paper. Why do I have to give all this data?
Furthermore, I have seen a lot of detailed documents in other projects; whitepaper, onepager, business plan, detailed information about the benefits for holders, and so on. i miss this all here
That should be easy to retrieve with an ICO.