How do you enforce the will of the majority without breaking your justice system?
I don't know if I understand your question. It's not about my justice system. If majority could decide they would decide against a distrubution of money where 5% have 95%. Why wouldn't they? The only one who would be against it are the 5%, which in a democratic financial system would be minority.
I agree; if they felt that was better, they'd do that. However:
What if now the majority decides that every individual can have only one Bitcoinwallet ? Now what if the majority further decides that each wallet can only contain a certain number of Bitcoins , and all the wallets exceeding this maximum, automaticly distribute the surplus evenly to all wallets?
You've also pointed out that they will decide what's best for everyone else; how do enforce this scenario on the, for example, 35% minority who decides they do not what this scenario to come to fruition?