"Tyranny of the Majority against the rights of all to the freedom of transaction."
this doen't make any sense. whenever majority doesn't decide it's a "dictatorship" of a small group.
The options you list are
- Majority decides for minority: Democracy
- Minority decides for majority: Dictatorship
There is a third option, which is each minority decides only for itself (or even each person decides only for themselves), which is anarchy. Bitcoin is basically anarchy, since neither a majority nor a minority can force a small minority to continue to use Bitcoin as is. And that is what my sig essentially points out, that bitcoin (and the entire internet, really) is a state of anarchy, and may influence people to transition into that state of mind simply by the way it works and what it considers as incentives and threats.