So we will see money moving more towards its primary function as a medium-of-exchange with short-term store-of-value and less of as a long-term, hard-on store-of-value. Why? Because knowledge workers crave knowledge more than money, because they can't buy the NEW knowledge they want with money, even if they tried. I explained why new knowledge can't be created out-of-thin air at ANY PRICE in the following linked section.
You're making a lot of assumptions here. First you seem to be saying that "we will see X", meaning (I assume since your prose is not precise) that
generally we will see X, where X is investors seeking anything but long term investments. Your justification for this statement is related to "knowledge workers". Thus, you seem to assume that generally, knowledge workers determine what is generally sought after. I'd like to see supporting evidence for this. It assumes that knowledge workers dominate the economic spectrum and that those workers prefer knowledge gains rather than long-term economic gains. This is pure speculation. I don't relate to this sentiment. As a knowledge worker myself (I think this term is too blunt, but whatever), long term investments are still extremely attractive due to the inherent shakiness of fiat currencies. Also, you seem to ignore a large portion of our aging population which is interested primarily in long-term investments, rather than short term. Finally, you don't mention the role that inflation has in preferring short term to med/long term investment.