Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Who was first with 28nm?
by
sickpig
on 04/12/2013, 16:31:07 UTC
I am not sure what KnC did or didn't do that caused you to be so negative about them.
Hm? I'm not that negative, as far as I can tell a lot of people are perfectly happy with them. When I communicated with them they couldn't keep a consistent story and it made we wary, but I'm glad other people are happy with them. I'm personally not all that happy with any of the major hardware companies right now, I'm concerned that their business practices have not been doing the ecosystem well, but thats neither here nor there and KNC is certainly not the worst of it.

Quote
versus 1W/Gh for KnC (Oct Batch pre-0.98 firmware)
Go update the mining hardware comparison as it's claiming 2.5w/Gh, if thats wrong then I retract my whining.

data just taken from a running October Jupiter running latest firmware hashing 562.86 Gh/s at the pool:



that means more or less 530 watts for the 4 asic boards. Add to that a few more for the BBB and the controller board and we could get something like 560-70 at the wall.

so roughly we have ~ 1w/GHs