I can;t stop laughing at people suggesting an escrow , (third party) for a supposed decentralized and p2p currency.
You see the Irony in it?
no, I don't. I'm certain that a third party doesn't 'centralize' things, and it's certainly in the spirit of p2p. They say escrow, what they mean is trust. Find a means to pay someone that includes enough trust for you to be satisfied with the transaction. The same with ANY transaction, BTC or otherwise. Where's the irony?