Exactly what he is trying to do but it is factually inaccurate.

As of this point in time knc asics are more efficient electricity wise than asicminer but not more cost effective in terms of ROI. Both knc jupiter and asicminer cube have a ROI of about the same.

You dont find it a bit strange that asicminer 140nm tech can compete evenly with knc 28nm? Knc process size is nothing more than a gimmick. When it comes down to the specs of current gen hardware, knc is not superior. And when it comes to made up specs on future hardware, asicminer still comes out on top with efficient chips that are around 20 times more efficient than gen1 asicminer chips.


So how exactly is knc superior again?