Re: [ANN] LINDA-PoW/PoS-99% APR- MASTERNODE-MULTI-WALLET ( NEW THREAD)
[...]
LONG TERM:
You can call "ridiculous" a simple basic multiplication.
2x 2x = 4x in 2 years: Built in the algorithm. 4x is basic. It's facts.
Until now: 4x 8x = 32x.
Direct change $ <-> Linda
Given the functionalities, the LindaX ecosystem will work with 1Linda = 1dime mid 2020 : Estimation of basic value.
This is 10x
Until now: 4x 8x 10 = 320x.
----------- END OF LONG TERM ( LOW FIGURE ) ------------
Read above: I wrote bigger, just for you.
Makes sense: about * would be = about.
I am sorry if you are unable to understand the concepts and if you cannot read the word "estimation"The major change from LindaV1 to LindaV2 is the transition from an alt-coin to a consistent transfer and payment ecosystem.
Lightning-fast transfer AND counter. fiat/token counter <-Linda-> fiat/token counter
If the increase in price comes before the increase of the value, it's speculation.
If the increase of price comes after the increase of the value, it is not speculation.
The value already exists. The price corresponds at least to this value. It's an organic price. It's not speculation.
Therefore, buying to this price has a sense, even if the next step does not increase it.
I find that 16-21 satoshis/Linda is a fair price coming from the cost of mining: The cost of newly produced coins.
In fiat currency, it would correspond to the metal of a coin, before giving a face value.
Nobody must buy, but everybody can buy.
In case of lottery, you have zero in your pocket when you paid the ticket.
Buying Linda, you have coins with high risk to win and low risk to lose.
Lightning-fast transfer AND counter. fiat/token counter <-Linda-> fiat/token counter
If the increase in price comes before the increase of the value, it's speculation.
If the increase of price comes after the increase of the value, it is not speculation.
The value already exists. The price corresponds at least to this value. It's an organic price. It's not speculation.
Therefore, buying to this price has a sense, even if the next step does not increase it.
I find that 16-21 satoshis/Linda is a fair price coming from the cost of mining: The cost of newly produced coins.
In fiat currency, it would correspond to the metal of a coin, before giving a face value.
Nobody must buy, but everybody can buy.
In case of lottery, you have zero in your pocket when you paid the ticket.
Buying Linda, you have coins with high risk to win and low risk to lose.
I think you mean here "high chance to win and low risk to lose"...
People understand perfectly: So did you.1cent = 125 Lindas @8000$/BTC -> Depends on $/BTC. It's a fact. Follows the price of $/BTC
Previous highest price = 90 = 0.9 cent
125 [Lindas/cent] / 16 [sat/Linda] = 8 @8000$/BTC. It's a fact, based on present value. Follows the price of $/BTC
0.9cent->1cent : It is fast obvious until end 2018. This is a reasonable estimation.
----------- END OF SHORT TERM ------------
Previous highest price = 90 = 0.9 cent
125 [Lindas/cent] / 16 [sat/Linda] = 8 @8000$/BTC. It's a fact, based on present value. Follows the price of $/BTC
0.9cent->1cent : It is fast obvious until end 2018. This is a reasonable estimation.
----------- END OF SHORT TERM ------------
I have no idea...
I dont know.
I agree. You don't know.I dont know.
LONG TERM:
You can call "ridiculous" a simple basic multiplication.
2x 2x = 4x in 2 years: Built in the algorithm. 4x is basic. It's facts.
Until now: 4x 8x = 32x.
Direct change $ <-> Linda
Given the functionalities, the LindaX ecosystem will work with 1Linda = 1dime mid 2020 : Estimation of basic value.
This is 10x
Until now: 4x 8x 10 = 320x.
----------- END OF LONG TERM ( LOW FIGURE ) ------------
Now the above calculated factor 8 (again, no idea where it comes from)
Try with a compass.pure speculation, ... -> pure speculation
Oh something is pure ?Read above: I wrote bigger, just for you.
And, as LINDA is right now about 0.001 $/LINDA, the right factor if it would rise to a dime (0.10$) would be 100.
Good simple math calculation Makes sense: about * would be = about.
LONG TERM - HIGH FIGURE
The fees are a comfortable passive revenue.
Like for shares, the price of Linda will be compared to it's revenue
My opinion is 1$/LINDA, at least, already at the end of the coin's production.
1$=10dimes
This is 10x
4x 8x 10 x10 = 3200x.
----------- END OF LONG TERM ( HIGH FIGURE ) ------------
CROSSCHECK:
Compare with evolution of BTC
The figure are of the same order of magnitude.
Therefore: Linda gives the chance for teens of today to buy for the price of BTC 9 years ago and get the same kind of profit.
The fees are a comfortable passive revenue.
Like for shares, the price of Linda will be compared to it's revenue
My opinion is 1$/LINDA, at least, already at the end of the coin's production.
1$=10dimes
This is 10x
4x 8x 10 x10 = 3200x.
----------- END OF LONG TERM ( HIGH FIGURE ) ------------
CROSSCHECK:
Compare with evolution of BTC
The figure are of the same order of magnitude.
Therefore: Linda gives the chance for teens of today to buy for the price of BTC 9 years ago and get the same kind of profit.
The author thinks that LINDA will be worth 1$ mid 2020 -> even more pure speculation
etc etc etc
Author's note: Read above.
etc etc etc
Author's note: Read above.
It seems that you have difficulty understanding that
- the 1st is the number of Lindas corresponding to a cent. It is a natural number. [cent/ linda] * [linda/cent] Perhaps too natural for you ?
- the second one is the present price of a Linda in satoshis, ie cent. Would you be surprised to learn that if you buy a cent, the result is a cent ? The relationship is a natural number [linda/cent] * [cent/ linda] . Of course.
I dont want to fight with you and i dont want to answer to your insults, after showing everyone, that your calculation is totally wrong. I am sure, you are a supporter of Linda. People saw that your calculation is completely wrong and only based on speculation (you call it estimation, what in the end is the same here). And i can only try to ask you again to stop spreading such nonsense (even when the calculation would not have been totally wrong), because it does not help at all. Please consider, i am a supporter of Linda too. You do NOT help Linda with such ridiculous price predictions, even when you think you do...
There is only one thing i would ask for. If you quote me, dont delete the essential parts of my message (e.g. Linda²/(cent * sat) ), thank you for respecting that in the future...