Re: Did China just legalize Bitcoin, clarify regulation, for its free market use?
In the linked thread I provided to you, the point is made by CoinCube, that my thesis can not be summarized. You will actually have to read.
Sorry sometimes knowledge can fit into a "sound bite".
This isn't a political contest. You either want to learn or you don't. I can't make that decision for you.
Sorry sometimes knowledge can fit into a "sound bite".
This isn't a political contest. You either want to learn or you don't. I can't make that decision for you.
Sry but your thread is about the fact that in future its about software and knowledge and not capital.
Fact is:
1) We need food...
Read the linked thread again. You missed the point.
Food will become such a incredibly small percentage of knowledge workers' expenses, like a grain of sand.
I dont really care.
Put some Vaseline in your anus so it won't be too painful.
Summarize the point you fool.
Amazing the point is right there above.
I guess you haven't considered direct connection to the brain then all your physical assets seem real but they are not. Even sex.
Or disposable assets that our 3D printers can print at will.
But still that isn't the point. You would need to actually not be stubborn and take time to read and digest.
If the bold part is your point I can only laugh.
1) Food ? 2) property ? 3) digital printers ? 4) transport ? Or will you just stay in one place in your virtual world 5) wont these companies that reconnect your brain be at least small sized ...
see you are making following points to refute my arguments:
1) No small, medium or large sized businesses (arguing against history and economics)
2) Individuals cant be controlled as mostly (90+%?) software and knowledge not physical assets will be consumed (no way to control what you actually bought to see if tax returns are accurate you say)
3) These software companies wont be number 1) regarding size
4) I will live to see this transition in my lifetime.
Keep trying.