So-called 'anti-vaxers' have been screaming from the roof-tops about doing rigorous and open access 'total health outcome' studies between the vaxed and non-vaxed.  For some reason governments steadfastly refuse.  The less well funded studies undertaken by the (probably somewhat biased) skeptics of over-vaccination seem to indicate that the unvaccinated are far less affected by a whole range of 'modern' problems facing people today.  Problems which just happen to be highly lucrative for the medical and pharmaceutical industry.

This thread starts out by outlining one of these studies.

If a full actuarial was done I'll bet that the vaxers will owe the non-vaxers a ton of money for the harm and costs that over-vaccination have caused to society and for making insurance nearly affordable in the U.S..  At least responsible and well educated parents can keep their kids from suffering the health effects of over-vaccination by telling the medical system to shove it, but it takes a strong person to do this, and it's much more practical for the high income folks to do.

The poor and uneducated tend to be the ones who flock to the doctor's office to get their kids shot up with everything that Big Brother demands.  Anti-vaxers tend to be from the more affluent and well educated social classes.