@hamnchess. Listen. Closely.
You want reasonable arguments? Here's one.
It doesn't matter whether or not referred users *can* do KYC.
That was *not* part of the original agreement.
Both parties need to follow the *original* agreement, right?
I know you'll just repeat your talking points. "It's easy". "If they're real, they can do it", etc. etc...
But answer me the main point, and the one you keep avoiding. Why shouldn't WCX have to hold up to their end of the agreement?
(You don't have to think it is a good agreement. You just have to acknowledge that promises matter, and should be kept.)
Either show me where it was stated otherwise, or stop telling people that they have to conform to your point of view.
I'm pretty sure it was. Idk about you- I bought presale and they had a page with information about the token etc. I remember it saying something about ID verification for referrals and banned countries.
In any case I think it's the logical approach. Why would they give you tokens for referring people who aren't active or real?
It would be a waste of tokens IMO and pretty bad for all those who bought XT and are buying XT because it would just dilute the supply. XT sales are already really close to the 1 billion maximum cap if you take into account the presale.