Re: Almost automated managing of +60 social bounties at the same time? Tagging?
I have mixed feelings about this case. I hate spam, but I don't think "inventing" a more efficient method to join a bounty campaign is bad. That is, assuming the campaign requires dumb tasks such as "share on Facebook", "retweet" and "copy link into Google Forms". Plagiarism and fake entries are much worse for a campaign manager.
I don't think improving posting efficiency is bad for the bounty campaign. It beats the countless people who submit invalid entries.
I don't think improving posting efficiency is bad for the bounty campaign. It beats the countless people who submit invalid entries.
The updates and keeping tabs isn't much of an issue but its not as innocuous as you are making it sound Loyce. How do you feel about the automatic text-generation part??
--snip--
Text generator
The tab Texts includes 200+ texts examples which will be used for text generator with all project hashtags. Let me say that the quality of texts is low. I'm using other examples. If you want a good quality - make your own texts
!IMPORTANT! You should paste "(tag)" at the beginning of your text, it will be replaced by unique hashtag of the project. It is necessary for correct work of parser! Otherwise, the parser may not find a tweet/post!
Example of correct text: "(tag) project has an amazing potential and a solid team to realize the idea! #1 #2 #3"
Text generator
The tab Texts includes 200+ texts examples which will be used for text generator with all project hashtags. Let me say that the quality of texts is low. I'm using other examples. If you want a good quality - make your own texts
!IMPORTANT! You should paste "(tag)" at the beginning of your text, it will be replaced by unique hashtag of the project. It is necessary for correct work of parser! Otherwise, the parser may not find a tweet/post!
Example of correct text: "(tag) project has an amazing potential and a solid team to realize the idea! #1 #2 #3"
200 random texts generated with the required tags inserted into the sentence. I think it is encouragement to spam/ plagiarism to use these pre-defined texts for all the projects. What are the other opinions?
To the OP, There are a lot of people here with the same problem of bad governments and low paying jobs. More than half the world has that problem. We are all in the same boat. You claimed to be genuinely interested in the forum while ignoring all the concerns being raised about spam due to ICO threads. If you had followed the forum, you'd know that joining 60 bounties isn't really what the forum is solely about.
Not all of these ICOs should be clubbed as useless but when there is no real discussion and people are only going to post generic shit, then where will the value come from? The spam and automated posts aggravates the problem of there being no way to distinguish between a fake project and a good one, in terms of the marketing space they gather. Crytpo is supposed to be a community thing. If all that the community does is get co-opted into scams by joining as many of these as possible, after being enabled to auto-post with pre-defined texts, then where will the self-regulation come from?