It doesn't matter whether or not referred users *can* do KYC.
That was *not* part of the original agreement.
Both parties need to follow the *original* agreement, right?
The thing is original agreement changed when SEC started chasing ICOs and crypto projects last year. Now you have to comply with SEC rules or risk getting cease and desist letter. I kinda understand your point, but what do you expect from them? To put whole project at risk just to pay some referrals? Lets be serious, they won't do that.
I would agree with you completely.
But they do not require KYC to trade on their platform. Only to claim the tokens.
If it is required to do KYC to claim a token, wouldn't it be just as important for actually trading, and dealing in what could presumably be considered securities?
If they had required it for all parties across the board, I would have been (still unhappy), but fine with it.
But it isn't about compliance, because then traders would be required to do it as well.
Nope. This is about not paying out, because they don't want to pay out.
***************************
***************************
And @hamnchess. Might want to consider posting on another board soon, to look less obvious.
You've posted 98? times on this forum, and been active since August.
100% of your posts have been on this board.Seems a bit odd, for somebody who in posts claimed to be fairly fluent in ICOs, and to have invested over 25K USD in this project, alone.
You'd think you would at least have a few other favorite projects.