Why LBTC it's a VERY bad choice? (Part 2)

Hello everyone. After my article, i get official answer and now have time to write new article.

• Quote: "Lightning Bitcoin team took coins from inactive addresses which altogether accounts for around 12% (2700000 coins) of the total number of coins."
• Answer: Shit... I write they took 20%, they answer 12%. They simply can not calculate how much they took. Why do i write 20%? I take 2,72kk from 16,75kk total coin supply minus segwit addresses and also some "forever lost" coins. But if we take 2,72kk from 16,75kk its 16,2%. Bad.
• Quote: "We have already completed two rewarding sessions: for light wallet testing, early awards for community contributors."
• Answer: Are you kidding me? I look LBTC Early Awards. Awards sum is 0,000155kk from 2,72kk. Gj, you accounted for the taken 0,000155kk of coins. 2,719845kk left. Bad.
• Quote: "The main objective of a market making is to provide liquidity for investors and traders."
• Answer: So what? So founders really sell it? How they provide liquidity? I see only one answer: they sell coins. Bad.
• Quote: "One of the obvious drawbacks of SegWit is a vast centralization of validating nodes, centralization in the way of centralized development."
• Answer: So they can make same as BCH (possible to claim but not to use), they dont. Sure they want quote "manipulate the price by limiting circulation supply". Bad.
• Quote: "Hope we answered all the questions"
• Answer: WTF? Really? Where answers about coins sended to exchange? Where this coins? If they dont sell it - show addresses with this coin to community... Where answers about votes for himself nodes and cobo pool?

Fatality: Also founder send new 50 000 coins to DigiFinex. Proof - coins sended from start claimed coins. They still "provide liquidity"?

Conclusion: The founder evades the answers to the questions, continues to forging the coin with his nodes and take a portion of the profit from the pool. He does not care about investors. You must beware of investing in this coin.