wouldn't they be able to deposit small amount just to reach the minimum and then do slow withdrawal?
if they think it is still profitable (after in/out transaction fees), they might be willing to do that
100k transactions fees add up and they also have to take the risk that we might actually block the withdrawal.
I have question about refback auto-share setup,
If I set 100% (or whatever %) of the commissions, is this amount protected?
what if before the distribution/payout time I lost all my balance, I wouldn't have anything to share
is there a way to set aside the current week's ref comm to guarantee refback comm to referrals?
That's a good idea, I'll add the option to protect that amount to the list of suggestions from the forum that I regularly pass on to wetsuit.
I personally don't understand why do you hold so much grudge against FreeBitco.in?
It's because he's a gormless troll with very little understanding of how anything works.
He thinks we are a scam because the faucet attracts new users and some of them then choose to gamble. Some of them then lose. There is a truism that if something is free then you are the product. The free money from the faucet gives us an opportunity to market the gambling and everyone can choose not to play if they want. It is no different to faucets that display adverts, you are still being paid to be marketed to. It's no different to what Facebook, Twitter and Google do with their free services.