Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Releasing of rank in yearly
by
Probinus
on 01/06/2018, 02:55:33 UTC
Getting 10 merits to become a Member is so hard though you are posting quality posts. How much more getting 100 merits to become Full member?
Are you sure what you're posting are quality posts? I checked your last posts and 95% of them are on Spam mega threads. Don't get me wrong, I also post there (requirement for signature campaign of course), but if you stop posting there and post somewhere else where posts are actually being read, then you might have some slight chance of getting into member, and even Full Member if people think you're really helpful.

To ranked up with existing merit system is really just a dream nowadays. Happy for those early birds on this forum as it is advantage for them. I think merit sytem must be demolished and introduced new ranks in order to top ranked not be overtakes by new comers instead of freezing the ranking system.
Nope. If you really get the whole point of this Merit system then this is also an advantage for newbies. Why? Being a high-ranked member despite of getting caught in this merit system means that you're a well-established member. And if you're a well-established member, you'd be respected and be trusted by many.


Distribution of merits is actually unfair as others giving sMerits to their personally known account owner and to those having multiple account gives to themselves.
Uhm, another nope. Let's say these multiple account owner have been doing this. Eventually, they'll run out of sMerits to give and still resort to contributing to the forum for merits. Also, if you look at the merit stats, merit sources, high-ranks, and even some medium to low ranks are distributing their merit very well. Well deserve posts will eventually receive merits.