Re: [Weexchange issue] The fall of Ukyo III - Updates and references
...
Does that include the janitor?
Apparently not. Turns out NO ONE at Neo & Bee is involved.
From Danny* himself :
*he uses his name on this forum
It can be read as no employee is working for ukyo. So no employee costs are used. That doesnt have to mean the NEOBEE-Heads.
Everyone at Neo & Bee are now involved in this resolution process.
Does that include the janitor?
Apparently not. Turns out NO ONE at Neo & Bee is involved.
From Danny* himself :
When I say no monetary cost, then NO ONE who works for Neo & Bee is involved, then I mean just that.
*he uses his name on this forum
It can be read as no employee is working for ukyo. So no employee costs are used. That doesnt have to mean the NEOBEE-Heads.
Not sure i understand. How are you reading these two statements:
Everyone at Neo & Bee are now involved in this resolution process.
When I say no monetary cost, then NO ONE who works for Neo & Bee is involved, then I mean just that.
Yes, it contradicts each other somehow. I only try to find an explaination. The last sentence might mean no paid users are involved so its no cost for NEOBEE and the first sentence might mean they want to say that NEOBEE is fully behind this now. Something like that. But the sentences are strange for sure...