When i initially joined bounty campaign, i didn't agree to the fact that signature campaign should be given a higher percentage in the bounty pool, especially when it has a relatively fewer participants compared to blog and social media. But i have now come to the realization that, signature campaign is the best form of advertisement for every ico. It helps to advertise the project to its target population. Almost every member on this forum is a potential crypto investor. Even bounty hunters can invest in their own small ways. Social media campaign has the potential of spreading the project to wider audience but not everyone they reach out to would be interested in investing in crypto. If we are talking about bounty campaign which ensures value for money, then i think its signature campaign. Friends what do you also think?
What you say is true. The reason why signature campaigns almost in all bounty programs get higher allocations than other campaigns because forum members already know about crypto which is a potential marketing target for ico projects. In addition, most of the forum members are investors, whether on a small or large scale. Unlike the audience of social media campaigns, project information will be widely accepted by the audience, but the audience is not necessarily aware of the crypto world.