I have seen situations where bounty hunters are side-tracked after providing their services towards the success of ICO projects. It is either they are paid less as against initial agreement, or they are not paid at all. I would have mentioned the names of some of those projects, which succeeded, are already listed and yet did not pay bounty hunters. Some things really need to change. We are to be treated with respect, most especially the honest bounty hunters.
I would say that its a fair assessment, but I haven't been in a bounty that I was not paid, so maybe I was just lucky or maybe I just choose the bounty that I wanted to join and do my homework before promoting them. However, I would like to really know why bounty hunters where not paid? Did the project was a success in their pre and ICO sale? Did they reach their target market cap? Usually ICO' doesn't pay if the project doesn't reach its soft cap, which is understandable, in my opinion. But for projects that become successful, there's no way that they wouldn't pay a cent for those bounty hunters.